2017-02-01
Report of the Nomenclature Committee for Algae: 15
Publication
Publication
TAXON , Volume 66 - Issue 1 p. 191- 192
Three names are recommended for conservation against the names indicated: Gelidium bipectinatum (Rhodophyceae) againstFucus serra; Scrippsiella (Dinophyceae) against Heteraulacus and Goniodoma; and Gloeobacter violaceus (Cyanophyceae) againstAphanothece caldariorum, Gloeothece coerulea, and Gloeothece linearis, while two names are recommended for conservation witha conserved type: Chara hispida (Characeae) and Gloeothece (Cyanophyceae). Three names are recommended for outright rejection,Jania verrucosa (Rhodophyceae), Cyanospira (Cyanophyceae) and Goniodomataceae (Dinophyceae), but the name Gonyaulax catenella(Dinophyceae) should not be rejected. The Committee concluded that the names Geisleria Nitschke (Fungi) and Geissleria Lange-Bert.& Metzeltin (Bacillariophyceae) are not sufficiently alike to be confused.
| Additional Metadata | |
|---|---|
| doi.org/10.12705/661.16 | |
| TAXON | |
| Organisation | Staff publications |
|
Prud’homme van Reine, W. (2017). Report of the Nomenclature Committee for Algae: 15. TAXON, 66(1), 191–192. doi:10.12705/661.16 |
|
