WILLIAM ROXBURGH ’ S PLANTS OF THE COAST OF COROMANDEL : AN ENUMERATION OF SPECIES

William Roxburgh’s life has been extensively documented by King (1895), Burkill (1965) and Desmond (1992), and most recently by Robinson (2003), but it seems worthwhile giving a summary here. his early life is poorly documented, but he was born in Ayrshire in 1751 and studied medicine at the University of Edinburgh in 1771/1772, where he attended John hope’s botanical lectures. In 1776 he became an Assistant Surgeon on the Madras Establishment of the East India Company (EIC). He made the acquaintance of J.G. König of the Danish establishment at Tranquebar (who had arrived in 1768) and eventually became Government botanist to the EIC. König’s botanical work impressed the Madras Government enough to allow him to make collections as far afield as Siam and the Straits of Malacca. However, his health deteriorated rapidly and he died at Tranquebar in 1785 ministered to by Roxburgh himself. Roxburgh moved to Samulcotah, “a small station about seven miles from the town of Coconada, and about twenty­two miles from one of the mouths of the Godavery river” (King, 1895: 2), in 1781. Here he established a garden for the growing and investigation of economic plants, and explored the surrounding area of the Northern Circars. In 1793 he moved to Calcutta where he was appointed to succeed Colonel Robert Kyd in charge of the EIC’s Botanic Garden; he remained here until 1813, with two long sick leaves at the Cape of Good Hope (1798–1799) and in Britain (1805–1807). He finally left Calcutta in 1813, his health by this time shattered, and, via the Cape of Good hope and St. helena, reached Edinburgh where he died in 1815. Roxburgh was renowned for his field work, the accuracy of his descriptions and especially for the quality of work he obtained from native artists in the execution of several thousand plant illustrations. Unfortunately, the extensive plant collections he made were not generally available to later workers, rendering the typification of his

plant names problematic (see below).His early collections from the northern Circars were lost in a flood at Coringa in 1787; those made from Calcutta were, according to William Griffith, distributed to various European herbaria by Nathaniel Wallich, but Wallich himself strenuously denied this.Whatever the truth of this the extant collections are widely scattered, at Geneva, Brussels, Kew, London (Natural History Museum & Linnean Society), Liverpool, Edinburgh and Oxford.For further details see Forman (1997).
Because of the sparse details on the extant specimens and their wide dispersal, the paintings he commissioned (known as the Roxburgh Icones) are indispensable for the typification of Roxburgh's plant names.Several sets exist, the one at Kew having been documented by Sealy (1956Sealy ( , 1975) and that at Calcutta by Sanjappa et al. (1993).Con siderable biographical information emanating from Roxburgh's vast correspondence has come from Edinburgh (Hedge & Lamond, 1989;Robinson, 2003) and Calcutta (Nayar & Das, 1984, 1985).
the Plants of the Coast of Coromandel (1795Coromandel ( -1820)), his most spectacular publica tion, was also the first published book devoted to the plants of the east coast of India.Its origins are intimately connected with the EIC's policy of economic exploitation of the plant resources of the country.Patrick Russell, a Company physician who had arrived in 1782, was impressed by the work of König and Roxburgh, and wrote to Sir Joseph Banks, President of the Royal Society in London, suggesting the idea of pre paring illustrations of the more important plants.With König's death in 1785, the job was entrusted to Russell who, however, left the country in 1789.Thus the job finally fell to Roxburgh who had by now acquired considerable knowledge of native plants with his work in Northern Circars (1781)(1782)(1783)(1784)(1785)(1786)(1787)(1788)(1789)(1790)(1791)(1792)(1793).Sir Joseph Banks received the first consignment of plates from Roxburgh in 1790.Printing was started in 1794.The first fascicle of 25 plates appeared in 1795 and the series of 300 plates was completed by 1820 in 12 fascicles (Desmond, 1977(Desmond, , 1992;;Stafleu & Cowan, 1983: 954-958).

RELAtIvE OBLIvION
The book was a landmark publication (Anon., 1823) for its intrinsic worth: high qual ity illustrations, description of many novelties, extensive information on the uses of plants, manner of extraction of plant products and copious local information including vernacular names.however, it passed into oblivion for two reasons.
Firstly, it was formidably expensive, and the size of the plates (58 by 46 cm) made it unwieldy.the plates formed an impressive florilegium that, indeed, succeeded in persuading the Directors of the East India Company in favour of their publication, but they were certainly not handy for general use.having advanced £ 2,000 up to 1799, the Company's receipts were only £ 401.Distribution of a large number of complimentary copies might have been one reason for this; and none of the 40 plain copies sent to India (at 20 Rupees per copy) was sold.Finally, the refusal by the Royal Botanic Gardens Kew of the offer of 194 of the original copper etching plates by the India Office in 1881 sealed the fate of the book (Desmond, 2003).The volumes remained locked up in big libraries, without even a comprehensive analytical index.The book has been reissued both in microfiche and 'hard' copy (on a reduced scale by Bishen Singh Mahendra Pal Singh, 1981), but even so it has been to a large extent overlooked.
Secondly, it dealt with only a tiny proportion of the Indian flora, some 300 plants, and publication took a quarter of a century to complete (Wood, 1969).Its value was reduced with the publication of its botanical content in the author's unillustrated Flora Indica (Roxburgh, 1820(Roxburgh, , 1824(Roxburgh, , 1832) ) and was, to a large extent, superseded by the great Flora of British India (Hooker, 1872(Hooker, -1897)).The production of over two thousand plates of Indian plants at affordable prices and in slightly more portable format (Wight, 1838(Wight, -1853;;Beddome, 1874) also somewhat overshadowed Roxburgh's pioneering, if extravagant, effort.
'COROMANDEL': TWO LITTLE KNOWN ANOMALIES 1.Neither the derivation of the name, nor even the location of the place, is certain.As to the name 'Coromandel Coast', the Imperial Gazetteer of India (Thornton, 1886: 205) reports the following: "Part of the eastern coast of Southern India, forming the shore of the Bay of Bengal.It is considered to commence at Point Calimere (10° 17' N, 79° 56' E), and to hold a direction nearly due north as far as Gondegam (15° 20' N, 80° 10' E) … The etymology of the name Coromandel has been variously explained, some tracing it to Karimanal … but it appears that it was originally denominated Choramandal or Cholamandal, which is considered to mean the mandal or region of the Chola, an ancient dynasty of this part of India".And, as to the location of a set tlement of this name (Map 1): "Town in Chengalpat district, Madras, 13° 26' 10" N, 80° 20' 36" E … Karimanal or black sand commonly used as pounce, is found here".The name 'Coromandel' has recently disappeared from the map since the people of the entire village have recently been relocated to make room for the Space Research Station of the Government of India at Sri harikota.
2. The use of the term 'Coromandel Coast' for the title of the work under considera tion is not entirely appropriate.The name refers to the region where Roxburgh began his professional career in 1776 (Tranquebar-Madras sector, see Map 1).The early botanical pioneers from J.G. König onwards were based at tranquebar, the headquarters of the Danish Christian Mission.And commercial activity was centred around Madras, some 250 km to its north.But Roxburgh shifted from this region to Samulcotah in 1781 over 300 km to the north of Madras, far beyond the northern boundary of the 'Coromandel Coast', when supervising the work of the EIC's Gardens there.In 1793 he shifted to Calcutta, another 600 km to the north, where he was in charge of the Company's much larger and more important Garden (1793-1813).The plants dealt with in the book did not belong to as limited a geographical area as the title would suggest, but were primarily plants of economic importance, originating from the following broad regions (see Table 1 for details): i) East Coast of India (Roxburgh's 'Coromandel' coast), mostly from the present State of Andhra Pradesh ('Circars' region) (197); ii) North and East India (56); iii) South India (19); iv) India (general) (14); v) Other countries (21).
thE PRESENt SCOPE The taxonomic significance of the Plants of the Coast of Coromandel lies in the assist ance it can give in the typification of Roxburgh's plant names, especially in the absence of specimens, or, when extant, which lack data.The pioneering efforts of Merrill (1952, unpublished) have been carried forward significantly by Forman (1997) whose account is so thorough, both in indicating the known locations of Roxburgh specimens (and drawings), and in pointing out the problems of typification, that it will remain the starting point for any further work on the subject.However, even in Forman's list only some 80 out of the 300 Coromandel plants are referred to.two other sources of information are Morton (1974) and Bretschneider (1898: 237-246), the latter with regard to the Chinese materials.
The scope of the present work is to provide, for the first time, a road map to the contents of the work by means of a systematic enumeration of the species, with a note on the provenance of the material.Note. the purpose of this is to draw attention to the geographically wide range of plant sources of the plants described.Because of the sketchy nature of the details given by Roxburgh, this is to be regarded as no more than an approximation: many have no details (though their origin may often be guessed), and some species are described as coming from more than one place.table 1. Provenance of plants.
i) Nomenclature: The name of the plant as it appeared in 'Coromandel Plants' appears first (sometimes an earlier name was adopted by Roxburgh, but not always correctly), without further references, even to Roxburgh's own later works.This procedure keeps the focus sharply on Roxburgh himself.If this name is now considered the correct one, bold face is used; otherwise, italics.The reference to 'Coromandel Plants' has four ele ments: volume, column (NB: there are two columns per page), plate number and year, respectively.This 'Coromandel Plants'based citation should sharpen attention on the need of typification of Roxburgh's names which is the ultimate aim of this paper, as already done for the work of another early south Indian botanist, J.P. Rottler (Matthew, 1993).Those marked 'nom.illeg.' are superfluous.
the name now considered correct, if different from the above, appears in bold face in a new paragraph.Basionyms are cited when necessary to explain any double cita tion.
ii) Provenance (see Table 1): These brief notes are important in giving the source of the plants described, and in drawing attention to their heterogeneous scope.they came from two main areas, based around Roxburgh's superintendentship of the EIC's gardens, first at Samulcotah (1781-1793) and later at Calcutta (1793Calcutta ( -1813)).Eventu ally the entire work revolved around Calcutta, where economic plants were cultivated under Roxburgh's supervision in his later years.
Plants were brought to Calcutta from various parts of India and even abroad.within India, the Province of Bengal and the speciesrich northeastern regions of the Indian subcontinent (including Silhet and Chittagong now in Bangladesh) were the main sources; others were the Gangetic plains, Mysore, Kerala and the Andaman Islands.Roxburgh's spelling of place names has been retained in the Enumeration.The following gives their current equivalents.

Table 2. Gazetteer of localities
Other countries involved were Nepal, Ceylon, Burma, Malaysia, Indonesia and the Philippines.Plants from the Calcutta Botanic Garden are well localized, with informa tion on the source of introduction of the plant, etc. (Roxburgh, 1814).
A second group of plants came from around Samulcotah, where Roxburgh's ac quaintance with the vegetation of the country originated.This group has a significance of its own, for its stamp of firsthand knowledge of local plants and the country, as is apparent from the high quality field observations on species from the Circars region.
finally, there is a third group of species with no obvious economic importance, such as Scrophulariaceae.These carry little field information and were no doubt mainly described and illustrated from the Circars.